Liquefied natural gas (LNG), often touted as a cleaner alternative to coal, has a greenhouse gas footprint 33% larger than ...

Two additional floating import terminals for liquefied natural gas (LNG) are expected to be operational in Germany before the ...

Liquified natural gas leaves a greenhouse gas footprint that is 33% worse than coal, when processing and shipping are taken ...

The work challenges the industry line that sending liquefied natural gas around the globe is a cleaner alternative.

Greenhouse gas emissions, such as carbon dioxide and methane, are released into the atmosphere, while a greenhouse gas ...

Rising LNG exports are expected from the U.S. to China, India, and other emerging economies, as well as global shipping ...

Global demand for natural gas will hit an all-time high next year as competition for seaborne fuel intensifies between Asia ...

A new floating liquefied natural gas (LNG) storage and regasification unit (FSRU) started commercial operation off Greece's ...

New research reveals that LNG exports from the U.S. have a greater greenhouse gas footprint than coal, challenging claims of LNG being a “bridge fuel.” ...

Liquefied natural gas leaves a greenhouse gas footprint that is 33% worse than coal, when processing and shipping are taken into account, according to a new study.

“Natural gas and shale gas are all bad for the climate. Liquefied natural gas (LNG) is worse,” said Robert Howarth, author of the study and a professor of ecology and environmental biology.